Home Biography Tables, Chairs Cabinet Furniture Beds, Built-ins, Other Work Exhibitions, Galleries, News Articles Links Services and Charges Teaching and Student Work Contact Back to Articles Top of page Top of page Top of page Top of page Back to Articles | Richard Jones Furniture‘The Gathering’ 2009- of the Designer Makers Organisation of the United Kingdom-Part 2by Richard Jones © 2009Curating Exhibitions- Brian KennedyFor many years now I have vehemently held to the maxim that I will not permit an artist to display their items on top of my work. However the professional curator Brian Kennedy the speaker during this part of The Gathering who has curated several exhibitions including the 2007 Contemporary Applied Arts exhibition in London, and has also worked with the Crafts Council of Ireland, has caused me to think more and re-evaluate the pros and cons of taking part in mixed media exhibitions. I haven’t reached conclusions yet, but I am pondering my position.Through displaying my work at a variety of venues, shows and exhibitions over nearly thirty years I have found mixed media shows are the ones that have caused me most angst. I have developed a real dislike for certain types of artists when they exhibit their work alongside furniture designer makers. I aim my venom more towards ceramicists and sculptors using metals and clay than any other artist. I can’t recall the number of times I’ve gone to the opening of a mixed media show in which I am participating to find a ceramicist had been along after I’d set up my work and thought my table, cabinet, chest, etc was the ideal plinth for his or her rough, knobbly bottomed objet d’art. They place their item on top of my work and slide it about until they get it just the way they like it. As a consequence they leave scores, sometimes deep ones, across the top surface of my furniture thus devaluing it, sometimes damaging it to the point of making my work virtually unsellable unless I took significant steps to effect a repair. Of course, the now despised potter (sic) usually denied they had caused the damage in the first place. Apart from the damage to my work by other artists and their items, it’s my experience that these pots, sculptures and other items are, more often than not, placed thoughtlessly on top of my work just because it’s convenient. I have witnessed artists set completely inappropriate items on top of my furniture: there is no synergy between the two pieces, or the ceramic object is out of proportion with my piece of furniture. Nowadays if I go to an exhibition in which I am participating and find additional items have mysteriously appeared on top of my work I take them off and put them on any convenient floor space I can find. Thoughtless gallery owners and managers can be as bad, but good ones don’t make mistakes such as the following illustration: I visited a gallery displaying my work for sale and found my furniture festooned with other sale items to the point, in some cases, that gallery visitors didn’t realise the “nice display stand” was also for sale. Brian
Kennedy, right, discussed these issues in some depth. He went on to
say, “You can display items on furniture, but the marriage of items
needs to be seen as complimentary to each other.” He illustrated his
points with a selection of slides from exhibitions he has curated and I
could see how judicious matching of disparate items can enhance the
desirability of all of them both individually and collectively.Kennedy made the valid point that “people are put off by white bases and plinths.” He suggested that exhibition visitors are more likely to become buyers if the work is displayed in a more interesting form, eg, setting the work up in a way that guides the viewer and shows them how they could use the item at home. Kennedy cited IKEA as an organisation that is very good at doing this. I have had the misfortune of following the arrowed yellow brick road herding techniques of the IKEA retail experience. I find their stores generally depressing with their mega-shed pile-it-high-flog-it-cheap displays, but Mr Kennedy has a good point about IKEA’s room setting displays dotted around their stores; they do guide the buyer into visualising how the furniture on display could look at home. He said it is a mistake to display too much furniture. “People become blinded by too much furniture.” How right he is. I recall taking part in the Philadelphia Furniture Show in the 1990s. In Houston I filled the van with all of my display items, drove the 2000 plus miles to Philadelphia and set up my stand. I should have left nearly half of what I took to the show in Houston because, in retrospect, I realised you couldn’t see my furniture for, well, all my furniture! I’ve had the same ‘can’t see the wood for the trees’ experience at other exhibitions. Even well known and well attended exhibitions make this mistake and the annual Celebration of Craftsmanship & Design held each year in mid to late August in Cheltenham, England is a good example. This exhibition has the laudable aim of showcasing the work of contemporary British furniture designers and makers. One reason I have never applied to participate, apart from the fact that I lived outside the country for several years, is that each time I’ve gone to look at the exhibition I’ve always felt the work was simply crammed into whatever space was available. There was too little room for me to stand back and get a good look at an item that caught my interest. And if it’s difficult for me with my professional furniture designer and maker background I can only imagine how hard it must be for a layperson to get a true sense of style, scale, proportion and purpose of a piece they are trying to view. It is the role of the curator to get the press involved in any exhibition venture, whether it be furniture, paintings, sculpture, etc. A good curator will work with the exhibitors to help them prepare information that the press can use. Mr Kennedy described a good curator is one that knows what the press wants to pass on to the public. The public “aren’t very interested in techniques. They want informing about ‘items of interest’ which mostly revolves around lifestyle ‘guidance’”. In closing Mr Kennedy illustrated the role a curator can have in introducing an artist to a completely new audience leading to sales for that artist to a new buyer profile. He discussed the role he had played in encouraging and developing some furniture artists through commissioning their work for display. He said that he felt there was a market for a particular furniture designer maker at a specific upcoming exhibition in Ireland and gently pushed this craftsman to create a speculative design. I took this to mean that the maker was somewhat reluctant to take the time out from existing paying jobs, and that there was a certain insecurity in the maker’s confidence and he perhaps questioned his own ability to execute the design within the necessary timeframe. However, the work came through, was exhibited and has generated several sales since. I think this story illustrates that a good curator has a finely tuned sense of which artists are working in a particular style or medium, and of market trends and/or fashions, and is sometimes able to bring the two together to the benefit of both. The problem for us as furniture designers and makers is, “Who are the good curators?” An opportunity for delegates to relax, socialise and put faces to names during lunch. ![]() ![]() Photography- Nick Carter (nickcarterphotography.com)I was hoping to get a great deal out of this talk on photography, yet somehow at the end I felt as if I’d left the table hungry. That is in large part because I was hoping Nick Carter, right, who has a background in editorial photography, would discourse on tips and techniques I could use to improve my own photography—see the small number of out of focus shots in this report for examples of my failings as a photographer, but this was not the thrust of his presentation.Mr Carter has an impressive and wide ranging portfolio of work and illustrated his talk with a selection of images he had taken for some of the well known coffee table type design and style magazines. He does not use additional lighting to create his images and relies upon natural light. One technique he described that really caught my interest was using a tripod under his digital camera and shooting the same scene using the same lens focal length but with a range of different exposures from over-exposed, through correct, to underexposed. Later, using Adobe PhotoShop as a digital darkroom he can manipulate the images by, for example, inserting over-exposed elements of one shot into a correctly exposed image to increase and improve the light balance under furniture. I think it is fair to say that if you have a certain kind of product, and you have the right type of business, along with a suitable marketing and promotional budget and you wish to reach a certain type of market, then commissioning a photographer with Mr Carter’s credentials and connections in the ‘style industry’ is absolutely the right thing to do. I am not in any of those categories, and take all my own photographs of work that comes out of the workshop. I make plenty of mistakes, and I really had hoped the presentation would suggest tips for some of the common errors that show up in my photography, eg, how to eliminate that white haze that often shows up on table and cabinet tops, etc. Branding- Paul Martin (www.pmdc.co.uk)
The
main thrust of his presentation imparted the wisdom that a good brand
says “who you are and what you do”. The brand is usually in the form of
a logo that goes with the business name, a logo alone, or a logo that
incorporates the business name. He makes a good point; who isn’t aware
of the products of the firm with the double yellow arch as its logo,
without even seeing the name McDonalds?
This was a useful reminder for me of the importance of carefully considering how a business brands itself. Who are your customers and/or potential customers? What image of the business are trying to present? If you find it hard to step back from your business to properly formulate the necessary questions and work through to the answers, followed by creating the brand, then calling in the services of professionals could be money well spent, but it’s my experience you have to choose your specialist carefully, already have a strong idea of who and what you are, and you have to keep these specialists focused on your needs. In
the past I have used the service of such a specialist to help promote
my business. It was not a good business decision. The people I worked
with, on reflection, seemed more interested in imposing their ideas of
what my business was all about than finding out what I really needed
and tailoring something to match my needs. I sometimes see what appear
to be similar failings on websites. It is sometimes apparent that the
web designer has rather run amok and used all the latest technical
bells and whistles available in their website building programme’s box
of tricks; but all this clever stuff just gets in the way of properly
showcasing what may in reality be a truly good businesses with
excellent people working for it, with a range of well designed and
created products, good service, and an ability to satisfy a potential
customer’s needs. Metropolitan Works- Matthew Lewis
Metropolitan Works offer a wide range of support to creative people to realise their designs, etc, so that they can be presented to a potential market. Services offered include manufacturing capabilities through workshops available to rent, manufacturing services, access to modern equipment and information technology, eg, AutoCAD and rapid prototyping equipment; business support, training and advice, etc. London based businesses are eligible for special low rates for certain services. CNC and the Smaller Workshop- Barnaby Scott of Waywood Furniture |